Introduction
The Designated List Disadvantages (DLD) is a term used to refer to certain categories of individuals who are disadvantaged in South Africa and thus receive preferential treatment when applying for public services. These include people living with disabilities, those affected by HIV/AIDS, and members of the LGBT+ community. The DLD can also be applied to other groups such as persons with low income or those from historically disadvantaged backgrounds. This article will explore what implications the DLD has on South African society and how it can be improved upon.
What Are The Implications Of The Designated List Disadvantages?
The implications of the Designated List Disadvantages are far-reaching, as they have an effect on many areas of life in South Africa including education, health care, employment opportunities and access to social services. Firstly, there are economic implications; due to their disadvantages individuals listed under the DLD often face barriers when attempting to gain access to financial resources which could help them improve their lives or even provide basic necessities like food or shelter. Secondly, there is an educational impact; students from these backgrounds may find it more difficult than others to gain entry into higher learning institutions because they lack some privileges that other students have access too (such as financial stability). Finally, there is a psychological impact; knowing that one belongs in a group considered ‘disadvantaged’ can lead individuals towards feelings of self-doubt and insecurity about their own capabilities and worthiness for success despite being capable.
How Can We Improve Upon The System?
In order for us all benefit from this system we need firstly look at how we define disadvantage so that it accurately reflects realities faced by various groups rather than perpetuating stereotypes or outdated assumptions about them . Additionally , revising criteria used by organizations offering benefits using the designated list would go along way in ensuring fairness . For example , if applicants’ past experiences were taken into account when evaluating applications then those who had overcome significant challenges would not necessarily be automatically excluded based solely on belonging within a specific group . As well , greater support needs should be provided for those already partaking in programs designed specifically cater towards designated list disadvantages since this ensures better outcomes overall . Lastly , stronger enforcement policies must exist within our government sectors against discrimination based on differences between race gender identity religion etc further decreasing negative impacts felt due inadequate consideration given where needed most
